Morphological marking of inalienable possession

Category
Nominal Syntax - Possession - Alienability
Notes
Where inalienable possession differs from alienable, the former takes a morphological marker (may include an associated free particle/pronoun)

Languages

Language Feature Status Grammatical Notes Source Etymology Notes General Notes Phylogenetic Code
Cahuilla
Cupeño
Luiseño
Serrano
Kitanemuk
Kawaiisu
Timbisha
Western Mono
Chemehuevi
Southern Paiute
Southern Ute
Shoshone
Comanche
Idaho Shoshone
Northern Paiute
Gabrielino
Achagua yes unpossessed affix for inalienable nouns, alienable nouns can take a derivational affix to become inalienable Wilson & Levinsohn 1992: 20
Resígaro no From the examples, it seems as though possession of an inalienable noun is indicated simply by the use of another preposed nominal. Allin, 1976: 169-175
Bare yes Unpossessed inalienable nouns have suffix, alienables are unmarked Aikhenvald, 1995: 13
Piapoco no Galindo, 2002: 93-95, 343
Yukuna no Shauer & Shauer, 2000: 520
Yavitero no Mosonyi, 1987: p. 38
Wapishana no Santos 2006:99
Wayuu no Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799
Tariana no Obligatorily possessed nouns cannot be used without a cross-referencing prefix, although this is the same set of cross-referencing prefixes that are used for optionally (alienably) possessed nouns. Aikhenvald, 2003: 127-128
Apurinã no Unpossessed inalienable nouns require the "unposession" marker -txi, but no marking necessary to occur in possessed form. Facundes, 2000: 152
Asheninka Apurucayali yes They both take morphological marking. A possessed (alienable) noun with no person prefix must have a non-possessive suffix . A possessed (inalianable) noun with a possessive suffix must have a person prefix. Payne 1981:4953
Maipure yes same set of agreement prefixes on active verbs Zamponi 2003:24
Yanesha' no Inalienabl and alienable possession are marked but they may differ in the strategy used Duff-Tripp 1997:33-4
Kinikinau yes Inalienable nouns show three different forms: non-possessed, possessed non-specific and possessed specific. Souza 2008:74
Baure yes Danielsen 2007: p118
Nanti no Inalienable nouns must always occur with a possessive prefix. Michael, 2008. p. 298
Paresi yes Brandão 2010:15
Palikur no Launey 2003
Yine no Matteson 1965
Añun no no difference, alianable may or may not be marked with same person prefixes Patte 1989:53
Bora no Seifart - 2005:64
Makiritare no Hall 1988: 288-289
Makushi no "The possession suffix must occur on alienably posessed items…. The inalienably possessed item never, except in past possession, occurs with the posession suffix, but only with the possessor prefix." The possessor prefix is a pronominal form. Abbott 1991: 85
Eñepa yes inalianable possessed nouns take person prefixes and possessive suffixes Payne 2012:74-80
Pemon no info de Armellada 1999: 13
Guna no Smith texts
Naso no Quesada 2000
Ika no Frank 1985:55-7
Kogi no info
Cabecar no info
Guaymí no info
Damana no
Sikuani no No apparent distinction. de Kondo (Vol.1,2) - 1985; Queixalós - 2000
Macaguan no info Buenaventura 1993
Aguaruna no info Overall 2007:261-2 more likely no
Northern Emberá no Aguirre 1999:79-80 Chamí
Waorani no info
Ingá yes This is a nominal suffix which is used for inalienable possession Levinson 1976b:54
Matses no info
Mapudungun no info most likely not Zúñiga 2006, p. 87-102
Páez no info
Quechua Ayacuchano no Parker 1965:32-46
Tikuna yes Montes 2005:133
Urarina no It seems that the "traditional" language had such a distinction but it is being lost at the time Olawsky:331-41
Waunana yes In Loewen (1954:82) it is said that kinship and body-part terms take the "indefinite personal possessor" /-mãʃ/ when they appear without a definite possessor. This suggests that the answr to this question is yes. However, Mejia (2000:90) suggests a no an Loewen 1954:82
Andoke yes takes person pns Landaburu 1979: 132-133
Puinave no Marking of alienable/inalienable nouns is marked with the samse set of prefixes Giron 2008: 206
Central Aymara no info
Kakua yes Bolaños fieldnotes
Kaingang no info Goncalves 2011:12
Minica Witoto yes Minor and Minor 1982. p.42, 90
Hup no Epps 2008
Nadëb/Roçado dialect no Weir 1984
Dâw no little info apparently there is no inalienable/alienable difference Martins 2004
Desano no Miller 1999, p. 49
Cubeo no Morse & Maxwell 1999, p. 91
Kotiria no Stenzel 2004, p. 197
Makuna no Smothermon & Smothermon 1993, p.40-41
Koreguaje no Cook & Criswell 1993, p.45 no info/not expected
Barasano no Jones & Jones 1991, p.61
Tanimuca no Strom 1992, p.66-67
Siona no There is no difference in the marking of possession between alienable/inalienable nouns. Wheeler - 1987:121-125
Tukano yes examples are all with pronominal possessors, marked with "referential" (to, of, toward, etc) suffix -re; this strategy can presumably also be used with some alienable relationships, but Ramirez only says that it is used as a marker of possession "especial Ramirez 1997: 227-228
Yanomami no no marking in existential sentences w/o verb (Pr-Pd), but inalienably possessed is incorporated in sentences involving a verb Ramirez 1994: 184-192
Ninam yes different markers used for inalienable Goodwin-Gomez, p.52-56
Sanumá no info Borgman 1990: p.126-128
Surui no info
Karitiana no Everett 2006:296, 303-4
Nheengatu yes inalienable possession must have possessive prefix Cruz 2011:156
Paraguayan Guaraní no Ayala 1996:85-7
Aché no info
Kokama no info Vallejos 2010:274-276
Nyangumarta no 0
Jingulu no 0
Wambaya no 0
Bunuba no 0
Walmajarri no 0
Nyulnyul yes 1
Warrwa yes 1
Worrorra yes ms13.1 1
Garrwa no 25 0
Gooniyandi yes 1
Warlpiri no info 0
Bardi yes 1
Yugambeh
Yorta Yorta no 57 0
Yir Yoront
Yindjibarndi no 143-147 0
Yidiny yes 1
Yanyuwa yes 4 1
Yandruwandha no 79-80, 118-9 0
Yan-nhangu
Yalarnnga no? 58 0
Woiwurrung no info x
Wirangu No 51 0
Wemba-Wemba yes H 34 1
Warumungu yes 55 1
Wangkumara no 51 0
Uradhi No 378 0
Paakantyi no 0
Pitta-Pitta No 197 0
Pintupi no 0
Nyungar no info x
Nhanta no 65, 77 0
Ngiyambaa no 231 0
Ngayawang No info x
Muruwari no info x
Mpakwithi
Mayi-Yapi No 45, 48 0
Martuthunira no 91 0
Marrgany No 308 0
Kuuk Thaayorre Yes 325 1
Kuku Yalanji yes 51 1
Kugu-Nganhcara No 428 0
Kaurna No info x
Kalkatungu no info x
Jaru no 194-6 0
Guugu-Yimidhirr yes 57 1
Gureng Gureng no info x
Gupapuyngu
Gumbaynggirr yes 261 1
Gugu-Badhun no 0
Yuwaalaraay No 49 0
Dyirbal No 61 0
Duungidjawu no 98-99 0
Djinang No 199 0
Djabugay
Diyari no 138-139; 140 0
Dharuk
Dharawal no info x
Darkinyung no 30-31 0
Bularnu no 38 0
Biri no 55 0
Bidjara-Gungabula no info x
Batyala no info x
Arabana no 95 0
Alyawarr no 118-9 0
Nyikina no 0
Yawuru
Ngarinyin
Yulparija No 29 0
Wathawurrung no info x
Mathi-Mathi yes 82 1
Hunter River and Lake Macquarie no 33 0
Thanggati no 20-21, 86-87 0
Katthang yes 66 1
Panyjima no 195-196 0
Ngarinyeri yes 35 1
Kurrama no 37; cf 35, 2.29 0
Yingkarta no 0
Githabul N/A 34 0
Gunya No 308 0
Kunjen yes 38-39 1
WesternTorres yes? FO 127 1
Wakaya no info x
Yindjilindji no 506 0
Bandjalang No 70 0
Ngaatjatjara No 41 0
Arrernte Yes 150 1
Kokatha No 55 0
Karajarri No 309 0
Pitjantjatjara No Y 14 0
Ritharrngu No 24 0
Warrgamay No 76 0
Warluwarra no 898 0
Warnman No 23 0
Djapu no 122-7 0
Bilinarra no 4.7.2 0
Wiradjuri no info x
Aghu-Tharnggala No 59 0
Narungga No 65 0
Tharrkari No 26 0
Wajarri No 48 0
Warungu no 644 0
Adnyamathanha
Yagua no Payne and Payne 1990:348
Baniwa no Ramirez 2001