Language | Feature Status | Grammatical Notes | Source | Etymology Notes | General Notes | Phylogenetic Code |
---|
Language | Feature Status | Grammatical Notes | Source | Etymology Notes | General Notes | Phylogenetic Code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Achagua | yes? | The suffix -ni can derive an agent, although no indication that it is confined to this use | Wilson & Levinsohn 1992: 51 | |||
Aché | no info | |||||
Adnyamathanha | ||||||
Aghu-Tharnggala | Maybe | 50 | 1 | |||
Aguaruna | yes | Overall 2007:430-1 | ||||
Alyawarr | no info | X | ||||
Andoke | yes | usually derives agent; morpheme is homophonous with 1st noun class pronominal morpheme, creates class 3 nouns; -a derives agents and patients | Landaburu 1979: 141, 153 | possibly comes from verb 'to be' | ||
Apurinã | yes | Facundes notes that both nominalizers are not completely productive. | Facundes, 2000: 244-245 | |||
Arabana | no info | x | ||||
Arrernte | Yes | 103 | 1 | |||
Asheninka Apurucayali | yes | Turns it into a noun, which can then be either subject or object. | Payne 1981:111 | |||
Añun | no info | Patte 1989 | ||||
Bandjalang | yes | 84 | 1 | |||
Baniwa | yes | Ramirez 2001 | ||||
Barasano | yes | Jones & Jones 1991, p.42-43 | ||||
Bardi | no | 0 | ||||
Bare | yes | Aikhenvald, 1995: 21 | ||||
Batyala | no info | x | ||||
Baure | yes | suffix -no (this suffix also marks the verb of a relative clause); "the product nominalizer -ri... derives nouns as products of verbal action" | Danielsen 2007: p88, 190 | |||
Bidjara-Gungabula | yes | 136, 141 | 1 | |||
Bilinarra | yes | 6.2.3.1 | 1 | |||
Biri | no info | x | ||||
Bora | no | Seifart - 2005:58-63 | ||||
Bularnu | yes | 31 | 1 | |||
Bunuba | no info | x | ||||
Cabecar | no info | |||||
Cahuilla | ||||||
Central Aymara | yes | ri is a suffix | Huayhua Pari 2001: 245 | |||
Chemehuevi | ||||||
Comanche | ||||||
Cubeo | yes | The animate noun põẽ- 'person' plus a gender/number suffix may also be suffixed to a verb, forming an agentive deverbal noun meaning 'one who does X' | Morse & Maxwell 1999, p. 90 | |||
Cupeño | ||||||
Damana | yes | For all productive nominalizing, the morphemes used are verb roots or verbs or nouns--unsure if this is true nominalizing | ||||
Darkinyung | no info | x | ||||
Desano | yes | Agent, subject, and animate patient nominalizations all involve the animate deverbilizers. | Miller 1999, p. 142 | There can be ambiguity between agent and animate patient nominalizations. For example, teacher and student are the same word. | ||
Dharawal | no info | x | ||||
Dharuk | ||||||
Diyari | yes | 163 | 1 | |||
Djabugay | ||||||
Djapu | yes | 109 | 1 | |||
Djinang | Yes | 129 | 1 | |||
Duungidjawu | yes | 44 | 1 | |||
Dyirbal | yes | 81-2 | 1 | |||
Dâw | no | Martins 2004 | ||||
Eñepa | yes | Gildea 1993:48 | ||||
Gabrielino | ||||||
Garrwa | no info | X | ||||
Githabul | yes | 26 | 1 | |||
Gooniyandi | yes | 1 | ||||
Guaymí | yes | Alphonse 1956:43 | ||||
Gugu-Badhun | no info | x | ||||
Gumbaynggirr | yes | 367 | 1 | |||
Guna | no | Smith texts | ||||
Gunya | yes | 314 | 1 | |||
Gupapuyngu | ||||||
Gureng Gureng | no info | x | ||||
Guugu-Yimidhirr | yes | 99 | 1 | |||
Hunter River and Lake Macquarie | yes | 90 | 1 | |||
Hup | yes | bare verb stem + classifier | Epps 2008 | |||
Idaho Shoshone | ||||||
Ika | yes | Frank 1990:19 | ||||
Ingá | yes | There is also a nominalizer for instruments /-nga/ | Levinson 1978:5 | |||
Jaru | yes | 230 | 1 | |||
Jingulu | yes | 1 | ||||
Kaingang | no info | Silva 2011/Goncalves 2011 | ||||
Kakua | yes | Bolaños fieldnotes | ||||
Kalkatungu | yes | 79, 56b | 1 | |||
Karajarri | Yes | 238 | 1 | |||
Karitiana | no | Everett 2006:296-300 | ||||
Katthang | yes | 86-90 | 1 | |||
Kaurna | yes | 4 | 1 | |||
Kawaiisu | ||||||
Kinikinau | no info | |||||
Kitanemuk | ||||||
Kogi | yes | Ortiz 1994:384 | ||||
Kokama | yes | Vallejos 2010:230 | ||||
Kokatha | No | 47 | 0 | |||
Koreguaje | no | Cook & Criswell 1993, p.27-28 | ||||
Kotiria | yes | Stenzel 2004, p. 104 | ||||
Kugu-Nganhcara | No | 411 | 0 | |||
Kuku Yalanji | yes | 57 | 1 | |||
Kunjen | yes | 111 | 1 | |||
Kurrama | no info | x | ||||
Kuuk Thaayorre | Yes | 426 | 1 | |||
Luiseño | ||||||
Macaguan | no info | Buenaventura - 1993 | ||||
Maipure | yes | Zamponi 2003:27-28 | ||||
Makiritare | no info | Hall 1988 | ||||
Makuna | yes | Smothermon & Smothermon 1993, p.35 | animate and inanimate | |||
Makushi | yes | Abbott 1991: 93 | ||||
Mapudungun | no info | However, there are other nominalizers such as /-wen/ which derives associatives plurals from nouns; /-we/ which derives intruments or locations and /-ntu/ which derives nouns where yhere is plenty of the substance denoted by the noun. | Zúñiga 2006, p. 87 | |||
Marrgany | yes | 314 | 1 | |||
Martuthunira | no | 144-148 | 0 | |||
Mathi-Mathi | no | 98 | 0 | |||
Matses | yes | Fleck:295 | ||||
Mayi-Yapi | No | 39 | 0 | |||
Minica Witoto | yes | Minor and Minor 1982. p.98 | ||||
Mpakwithi | ||||||
Muruwari | no info | 81-2 | x | |||
Nadëb/Roçado dialect | yes | subject relativizing prefix + generic nominalizer doo | Weir 1984: 27 | |||
Nanti | yes | There is one nominalizing morpheme, -rira. This is most often an agentive nominalization, but can also be used for other types of nominalizations. | Michael, 2008. p. 303-304 | |||
Narungga | No info | 70 | x | |||
Naso | no info | Quesada 2000 | ||||
Ngaatjatjara | No | 71 | 0 | |||
Ngarinyeri | yes | 19 | 1 | |||
Ngarinyin | ||||||
Ngayawang | yes | 5 | 1 | |||
Ngiyambaa | yes | 200 | 1 | |||
Nhanta | yes | 60 | 1 | |||
Nheengatu | yes | Cruz 2011:252 | ||||
Ninam | no | Goodwin-Gomez, p.116-117 | "nominalization" but none of these kinds | |||
Northern Emberá | yes | Mortensen 1999:30 | Catío | |||
Northern Paiute | ||||||
Nyangumarta | no | 0 | ||||
Nyikina | no | 0 | ||||
Nyulnyul | no info | x | ||||
Nyungar | no info | x | ||||
Paakantyi | no info | X | ||||
Palikur | yes | Green and Green 1972:49 | ||||
Panyjima | no | 0 | ||||
Paraguayan Guaraní | yes | Krivoshein and Acosta 2001:115-6 | ||||
Paresi | yes | Rowan 1978:xiv | ||||
Pemon | yes | There are four suffixes (which each have a plural form as well as a singular one) that are used to create agents. Which one you use depends on the transitivity of the verb and its tense. | de Armellada 1999: 159 to 165 | |||
Piapoco | yes | Galindo, 2002: 136 | ||||
Pintupi | no info | x | ||||
Pitjantjatjara | Yes | G 148 | 1 | |||
Pitta-Pitta | yes | 209 | 1 | |||
Puinave | yes | Giron 2008: p245-6 | ||||
Páez | no info | |||||
Quechua Ayacuchano | yes | Parker 1965:29 | ||||
Resígaro | yes | Allin, 1976: 112 | ||||
Ritharrngu | Yes | 79 | 1 | |||
Sanumá | no | derives "subject", but not "agent" exactly | Borgman 1990: 142-144 | |||
Serrano | ||||||
Shoshone | ||||||
Sikuani | yes | Queixalós 2000:162 | ||||
Siona | yes | Wheeler - 1987:114 | ||||
Southern Paiute | ||||||
Southern Ute | ||||||
Surui | no info | |||||
Tanimuca | no | Strom 1992, p.158 | ||||
Tariana | no | Participles are often translated as agent nominalizations, but they mark the predicate of a relative clause. The two agent nominalizing morphemes are non-productive. | Aikhenvald, 2003: 200, 460 | |||
Thanggati | yes | 62-65 | 1 | |||
Tharrkari | Yes | 21 | 1 | |||
Tikuna | no info | |||||
Timbisha | ||||||
Tukano | yes | suffix -se derives N from V | West and Welch 2004: 69; Ramirez 1997: 114 | |||
Uradhi | Yes | 372 | 1 | |||
Urarina | no | Olawsky:404-5 | ||||
Wajarri | No | 102 | 0 | |||
Wakaya | yes | 10.1.4.2 | 1 | |||
Walmajarri | no info | x | ||||
Wambaya | yes | 1 | ||||
Wangkumara | no | 14, 33 | 0 | |||
Waorani | no info | |||||
Wapishana | yes | Santos 2006 | ||||
Warlpiri | yes | n25 | 1 | |||
Warluwarra | yes | 959 | 1 | |||
Warnman | Yes | 27 | 1 | |||
Warrgamay | no info | x | ||||
Warrwa | no info | x | ||||
Warumungu | yes | 53 | 1 | |||
Warungu | yes | 227, 228 | 1 | |||
Wathawurrung | yes | 86 | 1 | |||
Waunana | yes | /-mia/ is also used | Loewen 1954:36, 73 | |||
Wayuu | no info | No mention of nominalizing morphology in the morphological template for nouns. | Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 797 | |||
Wemba-Wemba | no info | x | ||||
Western Mono | ||||||
WesternTorres | no info | FO 121 | x | |||
Wiradjuri | yes | 25 | 1 | |||
Wirangu | No info | x | ||||
Woiwurrung | no info | x | ||||
Worrorra | no info | X | ||||
Yagua | yes | a paradigm exists that specifies animate/inanimate | Payne and Payne 1990:354 | |||
Yalarnnga | yes | 50-1 | 1 | |||
Yan-nhangu | ||||||
Yandruwandha | yes | 119, 120 | 1 | |||
Yanesha' | yes | The orthographic form is -añ/-ñ/-aña/-ña | Duff-Tripp 1997:39 | |||
Yanomami | yes | Lizot says this kind of derivational morphology is not very productive | Lizot 1996: p.227 | |||
Yanyuwa | no info | x | ||||
Yavitero | yes | Mosonyi, 1987: p. 47 | ||||
Yawuru | ||||||
Yidiny | not done yet | X | ||||
Yindjibarndi | yes | 107, 117 | 1 | |||
Yindjilindji | no info | x | ||||
Yine | no info | Matteson 1965 | ||||
Yingkarta | no info | x | ||||
Yir Yoront | ||||||
Yorta Yorta | no | 98 | 0 | |||
Yugambeh | ||||||
Yukuna | no | There are three nominalizing markers. One seems to be an object nominalizer, (see line 97), suggesting that agentive and action/state nominalizers, if present, aren't productive. | Shauer & Shauer, 1978: p. 48 | |||
Yulparija | No | 55 | 0 | |||
Yuwaalaraay | yes | 106 | 1 |
Language |
---|