Dedicated past marker(s)

Category
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense
Notes
Past tense is regularly morphologically marked on the verb or elsewhere

Languages

Language Feature Status Grammatical Notes Source Etymology Notes General Notes Phylogenetic Code
Cahuilla
Cupeño
Luiseño
Serrano
Kitanemuk
Kawaiisu
Timbisha
Western Mono
Chemehuevi
Southern Paiute
Southern Ute
Shoshone
Comanche
Idaho Shoshone
Northern Paiute
Gabrielino
Achagua yes Wilson & Levinsohn 1992: 107
Resígaro yes Past-tense markers seem to be second-position clitics, so they are often phonologically attached to the subject marker. There is no indication of how regular they are, but they often show up in examples. Allin, 1976: 342
Bare no there is a marker which implies the perfect aspect and the past tense) Aikhenvald, 1995: 31
Piapoco yes Seems to be fused with a perfective aspect marker. Indicates that the event occurred more than three days in the past. Galindo, 2002: 170-171
Yukuna yes Shauer notes that other in the imperative mood, a verbal suffix marks immediate past tense. Shauer & Shauer, 1978: p. 38, 42-43
Yavitero no Mosonyi, 1987: p. 63-64
Wapishana no Santos 2006:167
Wayuu yes Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 801
Tariana yes The tense system is fused with evidentiality. Aikhenvald, 2003: 289
Apurinã no Facundes, 2000: 513
Asheninka Apurucayali no Only aspect markers according to Mihas Mihas 2010:128
Maipure yes Zamponi 2003:39
Yanesha' no Duff-Tripp 1997:118
Kinikinau no info
Baure no "We have to bear in mind that there is no tense marking in Baure."; "Since there is no tense marking in Baure, the interpretation of a situation as past or present depends on the verb's meaning and time adverbs in the clause." Danielsen 2007: p273, 175
Nanti no Michael, 2008. p. 249
Paresi no Brandão 2010:38-40
Palikur no no tense Launey 2003
Yine no no tense markers Matteson 1965:72-73
Añun no only aspect verb markers Patte 1989
Bora yes Seifart - 2005:62-72
Makiritare yes Hall 1988: 329
Makushi yes Abbott 1991: 116
Eñepa yes Gildea 1993:45
Pemon yes de Armellada 1999: 110 to 120
Guna no no tense markers Smith texts
Naso no Quesada 2000
Ika no Aspect is marked on the verb rather than tense.Ika distinguishes perfective and imperfective aspect. When the verb occurs in its bare form in a sentence, it expresses past tense Frank 1990:56-58
Kogi yes Stendal 1976:6
Cabecar yes These are verbal suffixes which also trigger an change in the tematic verbal vowel Margery 1985:106-15
Guaymí yes Inmediate past. There are at least two mophological past tense markers Alphonse 1956:29
Damana yes
Sikuani no same affix for past and present;usually inferred from the context of the sentence de Kondo (Vol.1) - 1985:17; Queixalós - 2000:218
Macaguan no Buenaventura - 1993
Aguaruna yes There are six different suffixes marking different past tenses which also encode differences in aspect Overall 2007:334 There are four past tense markers
Northern Emberá yes There are at least four different past tenses Mortensen 1999:71-4 Catío
Waorani yes Peeke 1973:38-9
Ingá yes Levinson 1978:14-5
Matses yes Fleck:397-9
Mapudungun yes However, verbs may be in past tense even when this suffix does not show up. Further, this suffix also expresses other meanings such as adversative in coordinate sentences and "lack of relevance". Salas 1992, p.140-1
Páez no However, Paez has "relative tense" which is not obligatory. The "relative tense" morphemes also encode if the subject is similar or not. For this reason, I think that "relative tense" markers are like switch reference morphemes in Paez Jung:93-4
Quechua Ayacuchano yes It seems that past and future tenses are marked by a combination of the appropiate aspect markes and the "non-present" suffix /-qa/ Parker 1965:28, 50-2
Tikuna no info
Urarina no There is not formal marking explicitly used for tense (p.481) Olawsky:459-492
Waunana yes Based on the examples. It also seems to be a sort of continuous/non-continuous aspect distinction (Loewen 1954:42) Mejía 2000:89; Loewen 1954:66
Andoke no info
Puinave yes Giron 2008: p277
Central Aymara yes Deza Galinda1992: 92
Kakua yes Bolaños fieldnotes
Kaingang yes Goncalves 2011:35
Minica Witoto no The verbs for past and present are generally the same distinguished using a temporal word (adverb) Minor and Minor 1982. p.22
Hup no Epps 2008
Nadëb/Roçado dialect yes post verbal particle, not required Weir 1984:58
Dâw yes Martins 2004
Desano yes Miller 1999, p. 69
Cubeo yes Morse & Maxwell 1999, p. 40
Kotiria no no tense Stenzel 2007:255-263
Makuna yes Smothermon & Smothermon 1993, p.49
Koreguaje no Cook & Criswell 1993, p.62-73
Barasano yes Jones & Jones 1991, p.85
Tanimuca yes Strom 1992, p.73
Siona no there doesn't seem to be tense Wheeler - 1987:147-149
Tukano yes West and Welch 2004: 12-13, 50
Yanomami yes Ramirez 1994: 240
Ninam no Goodwin-Gomez, p.93
Sanumá yes Borgman 1990: 169
Surui yes Van der Meer (?):12
Karitiana no Karitiana distinguishes between future and non-future tense Everett 2006:265
Nheengatu no according to author, no TAM markers in Nheengatu (footnote pg. 36) Cruz 2011:36
Paraguayan Guaraní yes Ayala 1996:317-9
Aché yes There are two past markers: /-re/ and /-we/ Rossler 2008:89
Kokama yes marked by enclitic Vallejos 2010:473
Nyangumarta yes 1
Jingulu yes 1
Wambaya yes 1
Bunuba yes 1
Walmajarri yes 1
Nyulnyul yes 1
Warrwa yes 1
Worrorra yes 31 1
Garrwa yes 51 1
Gooniyandi no 0
Warlpiri yes n40 1
Bardi yes 1
Yugambeh
Yorta Yorta yes 84 1
Yir Yoront
Yindjibarndi yes 97 1
Yidiny yes 1
Yanyuwa yes 141 1
Yandruwandha yes 126 1
Yan-nhangu
Yalarnnga yes 39 1
Woiwurrung yes 74 1
Wirangu yes 115 1
Wemba-Wemba yes H 43 1
Warumungu yes 33 1
Wangkumara yes 34 1
Uradhi Yes 363 1
Paakantyi yes 198, 203 1
Pitta-Pitta yes 202 1
Pintupi yes 168-169; 174-175 1
Nyungar no info x
Nhanta yes 90-91 1
Ngiyambaa yes 158 1
Ngayawang yes 15 1
Muruwari yes 155 1
Mpakwithi
Mayi-Yapi yes 56 1
Martuthunira yes 139 1
Marrgany yes 315-316 1
Kuuk Thaayorre Yes 353 1
Kuku Yalanji yes 92 1
Kugu-Nganhcara yes 407 1
Kaurna yes 16 1
Kalkatungu yes 45b 1
Jaru yes 77 1
Guugu-Yimidhirr yes 80 1
Gureng Gureng no info x
Gupapuyngu
Gumbaynggirr yes 291 1
Gugu-Badhun yes 149 1
Yuwaalaraay Yes 70 1
Dyirbal No 55 0
Duungidjawu yes 70 1
Djinang Yes 167 1
Djabugay
Diyari yes 85 1
Dharuk
Dharawal yes 55 1
Darkinyung yes 40 1
Bularnu yes 71 1
Biri yes 35-6 1
Bidjara-Gungabula yes 91 1
Batyala no info x
Arabana yes 163 1
Alyawarr yes 49 1
Nyikina yes 1
Yawuru
Ngarinyin
Yulparija Yes 35 1
Wathawurrung yes 77-79 1
Mathi-Mathi yes 97 1
Hunter River and Lake Macquarie yes 69 1
Thanggati no 42-3 0
Katthang yes 75 1
Panyjima yes 169 1
Ngarinyeri yes 42 1
Kurrama yes 120 1
Yingkarta yes 1
Githabul yes 24 1
Gunya yes 325 1
Kunjen yes 108 1
WesternTorres yes FO 136-7 1
Wakaya yes 209 1
Yindjilindji yes 510 1
Bandjalang yes 94 1
Ngaatjatjara yes 32 1
Arrernte Yes 169 1
Kokatha Yes 29 1
Karajarri Yes 165 1
Pitjantjatjara Yes Y 8 1
Ritharrngu Yes 65 1
Warrgamay No 56 0
Warluwarra yes 912 1
Warnman Yes 45 1
Djapu yes 71-2 1
Bilinarra yes 6.1.2.1 1
Wiradjuri yes 15 1
Aghu-Tharnggala No 70 0
Narungga No info 74 x
Tharrkari Yes 38 1
Wajarri Yes 96 1
Warungu yes 260 1
Adnyamathanha
Yagua yes Payne and Payne 1990:386
Baniwa yes Ramirez 2001