Phonology - Segmental |
Pre-/post-nasalized stops |
Analysis posits that the stop is the most relevant underlying phoneme. Comment in notes on whether the nasal contour is understood as a phonetic (allophonic) effect, or is phonologically contrastive. |
no |
|
|
|
Alvarez, José (1985). Aspects of the Phonology of Guajiro. PhD dissertation: University of Essex: p. 35 |
Ana Paula Brandão |
|
|
|
Phonology - Segmental |
Glottalized/ejective consonants |
Phonemic contrast [NOT counting glottal stop/fricative] |
no |
|
|
Only /ʔ/ and /h/. |
Alvarez, 1985: p. 35 |
Ana Paula Brandão |
|
|
|
Phonology - Segmental |
Palatalized stops |
Phonemic contrast |
no |
|
|
|
Alvarez, 1985: p. 35 |
Ana Paula Brandão |
|
|
|
Phonology - Segmental |
Phonemic vowel length |
Does the language have long and short vowels? |
yes |
|
|
|
Alvarez, 1985: p. 40 |
Ana Paula Brandão |
|
|
|
Phonology - Segmental |
Phonemic glottalization/laryngealization of vowels |
|
no |
|
|
|
Alvarez, 1985: p. 25 |
Ana Paula Brandão |
|
|
|
Phonology - Segmental |
Complex onsets |
Onset consists of more than one consonant phoneme |
no |
|
|
|
Alvarez, 1985: p. 78 |
Ana Paula Brandão |
|
|
|
Phonology - Segmental |
No codas |
*(C)VC [no also equals highly constrained] |
no |
|
|
|
Alvarez, 1985: p. 78 |
Ana Paula Brandão |
|
|
|
Phonology - Segmental |
Word-final coda required |
Do all syllables end in a consonant? |
no |
|
|
Mansen (1967) gives examples of coda-less words. |
Mansen, Richard A. 1967 "Guajiro Phonemes" In Viola G. Waterhouse (ed.) Phonemic Systems of Colombian languages. Norman, OK: SIL International and UT Arlington Publications in Linguistics 14: p. 49 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Phonology - Suprasegmental |
Contrastive tones |
Note how many contrastive tones |
yes |
|
|
2 tones. Phonemic 'stress' (one syllable per word, so primary stress) is realized with high pitch more than with intensity. |
Mansen, 1967: p. 49 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Phonology - Suprasegmental |
Contrastive stress |
Does stress occur on different syllables with meaning difference? |
yes |
|
|
Pitch-accent, but stress is described as 'phonemic.' |
Mansen, 1967: p. 56 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Phonology - Suprasegmental |
Nasalization property of morpheme or syllable |
In contrast to nasalization as a property of segments |
no |
|
|
Nasalization spreads from nasal stops to vowels, but it doesn't seem to be a 'property' of a syllable/morpheme. Also, doesn't seem to be phonemic. |
Mansen, 1967: p. 58, Mansen, Richard A. and Karis Mansen. (1984). Aprendamos Guajiro. SIL |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Phonology - Suprasegmental |
Nasal spreading across some morpheme boundaries |
Do some affixes or other morphemes take the nasal/oral properties of the root they attach to? |
yes |
|
|
All the words derived from eeju 'to smell' have nasalization all across the word, but nasalization isn't phonemic. |
Mansen, 1967: p. 58, Mansen, Richard A. and Karis Mansen. (1984). Aprendamos Guajiro. SIL |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Phonology - Suprasegmental |
Vowel harmony |
|
yes |
|
|
|
Alvarez, 1985: p. 165; Mansen, Richard A. & David Captain. (2000). "El idioma Wayuu (o Guajiro)" In María Stella González de Pérez and María Luisa Rodriguez de Montes (eds.) Lenguas Indígenas de Colombia: una visión descriptiva: p. 798 |
Ana Paula Brandão, Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Verbal fusion (2+ categories marked by portmanteau morphemes on verb) |
Verb combines two or more categories (tense, aspect, mood, person, number, etc.) in portmanteau morphemes{ [ignore proclitics unless they are fused with values other than person/number] |
yes |
|
|
The person marking suffixes vary depending on the tense/aspect of the verb, although tense/aspect may be marked with additional morphemes as well. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 800-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Inflection manifested by replacement of segmental or suprasegmental phonemes |
Stem change, tone |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 800-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Verbal synthesis (1+ inflectional categories marked by verbal affixes) |
Morphological complexity in verbs - multiple inflectional affixes in a single verb word |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 800-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Prefixing/suffixing inflectional morph: strongly prefixing |
There are many more prefixes than suffixes |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 798-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Prefixing/suffixing inflectional morph: strongly suffixing |
There are many more suffixes than prefixes |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 798-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Prefixing/suffixing inflectional morph: roughly equal or one weakly preferred |
The numbers of suffixes and prefixes are not notably different |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 798-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Reduplication: full |
The full morpheme is reduplicated |
no info |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - General |
Reduplication: partial |
Only part of the morpheme is reduplicated |
no info |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - Compounding, auxiliaries, light verbs |
Productive NN compounding |
Noun compounds created from two noun phrases are common and systematically produced |
yes |
|
|
There does seem to be compounding, but not clear how productive it is. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - Compounding, auxiliaries, light verbs |
Productive VV serialization (without compounding) |
Verb roots can be combined in a single predicate without markers of subordination (distinct from subordinating construction) or distinct inflection |
no info |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - Compounding, auxiliaries, light verbs |
Productive VV compounding |
Serial verb constructions involve chaining of roots together in one morphophonological word |
not clear |
|
|
Mansen & Captain (2000) note that there is verb "compounding" but the examples they give do not have multiple roots, they are roots plus things like causatives, etc. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - Compounding, auxiliaries, light verbs |
Verb-adjunct (aka light verb) constructions |
There is a set of semantically weak verbs used in complex verbal constructions, e.g. 'take a nap' |
yes |
|
|
There are several auxiliaries. One of these, calucaa, is said to have a “verbalizing function” for non-verbs. |
Mansen & Mansen, 1976: p. 256 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - Compounding, auxiliaries, light verbs |
Auxiliary verb(s) |
There are verbs that accompany main verbs of clauses and take grammatical marking not expressed by main verbs |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Mansen, 1976: p. 256 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - Incorporation |
Incorporation of nouns into verbs is a productive intransitivizing process |
Verb contains nominal segment |
no |
|
|
The verb template does not include a slot for incorporated elements. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Morphology - Incorporation |
Productive incorporation of other elements (adjectives, locatives, etc.) into verbs |
Like noun incorporation, but incorporated elements are not nouns |
no |
|
|
The template for verbs does not include a slot for incorporated elements. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Noun classes/genders |
Nouns are organized into sets with distinct morphological treatment; usually affects all nouns and involves agreement within the NP |
yes |
|
|
masculine/non-masculine, and plural. The non-masculine seems to be the 'unmarked' form, marking inanimates and even things like 'ancestors.' |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 796-797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Number of noun classes/genders |
Note the (approximate) total number of noun classes/genders |
3 |
-kai (masc.) -kat (non-masculine), -kana (plural) |
-kai (masc.) -kat (non-masculine), -kana (plural) |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Noun classifiers (distinct from noun classes/genders) |
Nouns are organized into sets, but only a limited set of nouns may be implicated, with no or limited agreement marking. If only numeral classifiers exist, indicate yes but explain. |
no |
|
|
Sometimes two or more nouns can link up, but the first noun is more generic and the nouns that follow specify the referent. There is only one example--there are three words for 'people,' (guajiro, non-guajiro indigenous, and indigenous), and the following |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Sex is a relevant category in noun class(ification) system for animates |
Masculine, feminine, neuter |
yes |
|
|
Masculine vs. non-masculine |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Sex is a relevant category in noun class(ification) system for inanimates |
|
no |
|
|
All examples of inanimates get singular, non-masculine marking. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Animacy (w/o reference to sex) is a relevant category in the noun class(ification) system |
Animate/inanimate, human/non-human |
yes |
|
|
Animates are marked for gender, inanimates are all singular non-masculine. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Sex/gender distinction only in 3rd person pronouns |
add in notes section whether gender is present in other PNs or not in any PNs; consider with reference to pronouns and person marking only |
yes |
|
|
No other pronouns are marked for gender, although gender is a category elsewhere. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Shape is a relevant category in the noun class(ification) system for animates |
|
n/a |
|
|
Does not appear to be a noun classifier system. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Shape is a relevant category in the noun class(ification) system for inanimates |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
"Repeater" classifiers |
Where no distinct classifier exists, a copy of the noun itself may function in the morphosyntactic classifier "slot" |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Numeral classifiers (specific to numerals) |
Special classifier forms that occur only with numerals |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Gender and noun classification |
Classifiers used as derivational suffixes to derive nouns |
Verb + classifier = 'thing for doing V, thing that does V, etc.' |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Singular number may be marked on the noun |
Often occurs in a small subset of nouns if a single entity is referred to, e.g. insects that normally occur in groups |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 796-800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Plural affix on noun |
|
yes |
-irua |
-irua |
Plural may also be marked with the 'definite article,' -kana, which is affixed to the noun. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Plural marked by stem change or tone on noun |
|
no |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Plural marked by reduplication of noun |
|
no |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Plural word/clitic |
|
no |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Plural marked on human or animate nouns only |
|
no |
|
|
Examples of inanimates with plural marking. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Pronominal plural: stem + nominal plural affix |
Pronouns use a nominal plural affix not specific to pronouns |
no |
|
|
Plural pronouns are suppletive. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797-798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Number |
Unique associative plural marker |
e.g. 'John and his associates', 'John and them' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Definiteness and clusivity |
Definite or specific articles |
Definite = particular referent known to both speaker and addressee; specific = particular referent known to speaker only |
yes |
-kai (masc.) -kat (non-masculine), -kana (plural) |
-kai (masc.) -kat (non-masculine), -kana (plural) |
Not sure whether these are definite or specific. |
Mansen & Captain, p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Definiteness and clusivity |
Marker of definiteness distinct from demonstratives |
Focus on articles/markers whose primary function is to mark definiteness |
yes |
|
|
Demonstratives are separate words, definite articles are suffixed to the noun or the verb in a relative clause. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797, 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Definiteness and clusivity |
Indefinite or non-specific article |
or marker |
yes |
wane |
wane |
This is a reduced form of the numeral 'one.' |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Definiteness and clusivity |
Inclusive/exclusive: in free pronominals |
Inclusive =us + you, exclusive = us but not you |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Definiteness and clusivity |
Inclusive/exclusive: in verbal inflection (bound) |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Definiteness and clusivity |
Distance contrasts in demonstratives (number) |
Note the number of distances in the demonstrative system |
4 |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Definiteness and clusivity |
Other contrasts in demonstratives (visibility, elevation, etc.) |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Pronominal categories |
Gender in 3sg pronouns |
|
yes |
nia (3rd masc.), ʃia (3rd non-masc.) |
nia (3rd masc.), ʃia (3rd non-masc.) |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 796 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Pronominal categories |
Gender in 3pl pronouns |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 796 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Pronominal categories |
Gender in 1st and/or 2nd person pronouns |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 796 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Pronominal categories |
Formal/informal distinction in pronouns |
Polite pronominal variants or differential avoidance of pronouns |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Pronominal categories |
Reflexive pronouns |
e.g. English 'himself', Spanish 'se'; distinct form(s) from basic (non-reflexive) pronominals; distinct from reflexive verbal affix |
no info |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Adpositions mark core NPs |
Prepositions or postpositions mark subjects, objects, beneficiaries/recipients |
yes |
-a |
-a |
Indirect object is marked, subject and object are not. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: number of cases |
Note the number of grammatical relations that may be morphologically marked on the noun |
13 |
|
|
Mansen & Captain note that the case suffixes can occur attached to the noun, but in some cases (in relative or passive clauses), they may be detached. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: only non-core arguments morphologically marked |
Subjects, objects, beneficiaries/recipients NOT marked, but other grammatical relations are |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: symmetrical |
All NPs marked if in appropriate syntactic relation; no distinction in marking based on semantics (type of entity) |
yes |
|
|
No indication that there are restrictions on the type of entity to which a case marker can attach. Many examples are of inanimates. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: asymmetrical |
Semantically defined subset of NPs marked for case, e.g. animates |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: suffix or postpositional clitic |
|
yes |
|
|
Mansen & Captain (2000) note that case is usually marked with a suffix, but, on rare occasions, most of the case markers can be free words as well. They can be cliticized to either a personal prefix or the noun. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: prefix or prepositional clitic |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: infix or inpositional clitic |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: stem change |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: tone |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Case and adpositions |
Case: comitative = instrumental |
Same marking for 'with a person' and 'with an instrument' |
no |
aka (instrument), amaa (comitative) |
aka (instrument), amaa (comitative) |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Numerals |
Base-2 |
At least some part of the system involves base-2 |
no |
|
|
|
Captain, 2005 (numerals database) |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Numerals |
Base-5 |
At least some part of the system involves base-5 |
no |
|
|
|
Captain, 2005 (numerals database) |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Numerals |
Base-10 |
At least some part of the system involves base-10 |
yes |
|
|
|
Captain, 2005 (numerals database) |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Numerals |
Other base (specify) |
4, 20, etc. |
no |
|
|
|
Captain, 2005 (numerals database) |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Numerals |
Etymological transparency in any numerals under 5 |
e.g. two = 'eye-quantity' |
no |
|
|
|
Captain, 2005 (numerals database) |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Numerals |
Numerals do not go above 5 |
'Many' or some other non-exact term used |
no |
|
|
|
Captain, 2005 (numerals database) |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Numerals |
Numerals do not go above 10 |
'Many' or some other non-exact term used |
no |
|
|
|
Captain, 2005 (numerals database) |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Other nominal |
Tense or aspect inflection on non-verbal predicates |
i.e. nominal or adjectival |
no |
|
|
No tense/aspect inflection on the examples given, but it's not explicit. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Categories - Other nominal |
Person inflection on non-verbal predicates |
i.e. nominal or adjectival |
yes |
|
|
There is no person inflection on the predicate in equational clauses. However, there does seem to be person marking on the predicate in relational clauses. Both relational and equational clauses use non-verbal predicates. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession |
Pronominal possessive affixes: prefix on N |
alienable/inalienable? |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession |
Pronominal possessive affixes: suffix on N |
alienable/inalienable? |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession |
Head/dependent marking in possessive NP: dependent |
e.g. 'the boy-'s dog' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession |
Head/dependent marking in possessive NP: head |
e.g. 'the boy his-dog' |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession |
Possessive classifiers |
There are special classifiers that occur with possessed entities |
n/a |
|
|
No classifiers. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession - Alienability |
Morphological marking of inalienable possession |
Where inalienable possession differs from alienable, the former takes a morphological marker (may include an associated free particle/pronoun) |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession - Alienability |
Morphological marking of alienable possession |
Where inalienable possession differs from alienable, the latter takes a morphological marker (may include an associated free particle/pronoun) |
yes |
-se, -in, -ja |
-se, -in, -ja |
These are only used on noun roots that are not considered inherently posessed in order to make them a possessed root. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession - Alienability |
Default marker for inalienably possessed nouns if unpossessed |
An inalienable noun that is in an unpossessed state must have a derivational affix or associated form |
yes |
|
|
“Possessed” suffixes are used to make a possessive stem, but only on nouns that aren't considered inherently possessed. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession - Alienability |
Inalienable possession of kin terms |
'my-father' but *father |
yes |
|
|
Body parts and kin terms are “possessed nouns.” (Presumably inalienably possessed). |
Captain, David and Linda Captain. 2005. Diccionario Básico Ilustrado: Wayuunaiki-Español Español-Wayuunaiki. Bogotá: Editorial Fundación para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Marginados |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession - Alienability |
Inalienable possession of body parts (human/animal) |
'my-leg' but *leg |
yes |
|
|
|
Captain, David and Linda Captain. 2005. Diccionario Básico Ilustrado: Wayuunaiki-Español Español-Wayuunaiki. Bogotá: Editorial Fundación para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Marginados |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Possession - Alienability |
Generic human nouns are obligatorily bound/possessed |
Human nouns must co-occur with another noun (e.g. Hup-man, NonIndian-woman, but *man) |
yes |
|
|
Mansen and Captain (2000) note that nouns can “concatenate,” where the first can be a noun that identifies a referent (when it's a human), the race of the person follows. Examples are “wayuu viejo,” and “wayuu señorita,” to mean something like “el viejo” |
Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Adjectives |
Underived adjectives |
There are underived adjectives which do not have counterparts in other word classes |
yes |
|
|
They are rare. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Adjectives |
Gender inflection on adjectives within the NP |
There is gender agreement/concord (animate/inanimate or masc/fem, etc.) within the NP, e.g. la casa blanca, el perro blanco |
no |
|
|
Only one glossed example in the section on adjectives--this doesn't have any sort of gender marking. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Derivation |
Productive nominalizing morphology: action/state (arrive/arrival) |
There is a morpheme which derives an event from a verb |
no info |
|
|
No mention of nominalizing morphology in the morphological template for nouns. |
Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Derivation |
Productive nominalizing morphology: agentive (sing/singer) |
There is a morpheme which derives an agent or subject from a verb |
no info |
|
|
No mention of nominalizing morphology in the morphological template for nouns. |
Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Derivation |
Productive nominalizing morphology: object (sing/song) |
There is a morpheme which derives a patient or object from a verb |
no info |
|
|
No mention of nominalizing morphology in the morphological template for nouns. |
Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Derivation |
Productive verbalizing morphology |
There is a morpheme which derives a verb from a noun or adjective |
no |
|
|
The particle calacá is used with a verbalizing capacity with non-verbs. Perhaps this is better described as a light verb, since it's called a “verb auxiliary” and used with a verbalizing function?? |
Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 801, Mansen & Mansen 1976: p. 155 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Nominal Syntax - Other |
NP coordination and comitative phrases marked differently |
'John and Mary went to market' is marked differently from 'John went to market with Mary' |
yes |
|
|
No mention of coordination in Mansen and Captain (2000). There are several dictionary entries for “y” in the (2005) dictionary. To conjoin sentences only o'ulacaa is used for sentence-level conjunction, suggesting the others can be used for NP coordinatio |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800, Captain & Captain 2005, Mansen & Mansen 1976: p. 182 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Dedicated past marker(s) |
Past tense is regularly morphologically marked on the verb or elsewhere |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Multiple past tenses, distinguishing distance from time of reference |
e.g. distant vs. recent past |
yes |
|
|
Mansen & Captain (2000) note that there is a general/unmarked past/present tense, a remote past, and an immediate past (perfect?). |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Multiple future tenses, distinguishing distance from time of reference |
e.g. imminent vs. distant future |
yes |
-ee (future), -i (imminent) |
-ee (future), -i (imminent) |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Dedicated future or non-past marker(s) |
|
yes |
-ee (future), -i (imminent) |
-ee (future), -i (imminent) |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Tense-aspect affixes: prefix |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Tense-aspect affixes: suffix |
|
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Tense-aspect affixes: tone or ablaut |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Aspect and tense |
Tense-aspect suppletion |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Dedicated imperative morpheme or verb form |
There is a special morpheme (or morphemes, or a bare verb root where inflection is normally expected) used to signal imperative (command) mood |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Polite imperative morpheme |
There is a distinct morpheme for polite imperative constructions (specify if it has other functions in the language) |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Difference between negation in imperative (prohibitive) and declarative clauses |
There are different strategies for marking negation in imperative and declarative clauses |
no info |
|
|
No description of the structure of imperatives (or negative imperatives) in any source. |
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Dedicated hortative morpheme or verb form (1pl or 3rd person imperative) |
as opposed to imperative; the person in control of desired state of affairs is not the addressee; ex: 'Let's sing' / 'Let him sing' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Situational possibility: affix on verb |
Inflectional marking of capacity to do something |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Situational possibility: verbal construction |
|
no info |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Situational possibility: other marking |
|
no info |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Epistemic possibility: affix on verb |
Modal expressing hypothesis |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Epistemic possibility: verbal construction |
|
no info |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Epistemic possibility: other marking |
|
no info |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Marking of expected/unexpected action or result |
There is inflectional marking of expected/unexpected |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Verbal frustrative |
Modal expressing frustration ("in vain") |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Verbal habitual |
Modal expressing habituality |
yes |
-puʔu |
-puʔu |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Apprehensive construction |
There is a single morpheme or verb form to mean '(be careful lest) X happens' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Reality status marking on verbs |
There are dedicated morpheme(s) for realis/irrealis 'actualized/unactualized events' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Mood |
Affect markers (positive/negative) |
Note whether these inflectional markers are positive or negative |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Directionals |
Directional elements affixed to the verb |
There are grammaticalized elements indicating movement away, toward, there and back, etc. |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Grammaticalized visual |
Indicates information has been witnessed visually - indicate only if an overt marker |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Grammaticalized nonvisual |
Indicates information has been sensed firsthand but not visually (usually heard; also smelled, tasted, felt) |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Grammaticalized inferential |
Indicates information has not been experienced firsthand, but inferred from some kind of evidence - indicate only if an overt marker. |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Grammaticalized reportive |
Indicates speaker is not responsible for veracity of statement, merely reporting; 'allegedly' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Grammaticalized quotative |
Indicate presence of adjacent representation of repeated discourse |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Other evidential |
Any other evidential values not represented above |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Evidentiality: verb affix or clitic |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Evidentiality: part of tense system |
Includes portmanteau morphs |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Evidentiality: separate particle |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Evidentiality |
Evidentiality: modal morpheme |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Verbal number |
Verbal number suppletion |
|
no info |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Verbal Categories - Other |
Social interaction markers |
Note the type of interaction |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
No fixed basic constituent order |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
VS in intransitive clauses |
Verb precedes subject |
yes |
|
|
Mansen and Captain (2000) identify a basic word order, but do not distinguish between intranstives and transitives (or ditransitives). |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
VS in transitive clauses |
|
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
VO in transitive clauses |
Verb precedes object |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
OS in transitive clauses |
Object precedes subject |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Preposition-Noun |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Noun-Postposition or case suffix |
|
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Gen-Noun |
Possessive phrase composed of a free possessor and its possessum has possessor first (e.g. John's book) |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Noun-Gen |
Possessive phrase composed of a free possessor and its possessum has possessum first (e.g. 'book of John') |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Adj-Noun |
Adjective precedes the noun |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Noun-Adj |
Adjective follows the noun |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Dem-Noun |
|
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Noun-Dem |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Num-Noun |
|
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Noun-Num |
|
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Noun-Rel |
Relative clause follows noun that it modifies |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Rel-Noun |
Relative clause precedes noun that it modifies |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Re<Noun>l (internally headed relative) |
e.g. 'the dog cat chased-NMZR got away' ('the cat that the dog chased got away') |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Relative clause is correlative or adjoined |
e.g. 'what is running, the dog chased that cat' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Word Order |
Question word is clause initial |
'what', 'who', etc. come first in interrogative clause |
yes |
|
|
The examples of content questions in the text in Mansen & Mansen (1979) have the question word clause-initially. |
Mansen & Mansen (1979). |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking in full NPs: nominative-accusative w/ marked accusative |
Objects of transitive clauses ('P') have a unique marker, while subjects of transitive ('A') and intransitive ('S') clauses are unmarked or share a different marker from that occurring on objects |
n/a |
|
|
No case marking on subject/object NPs. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking in full NPs: nominative-accusative w/ marked nominative |
Subjects of transitive and intransitive clauses share a marker, while objects of transitives are unmarked |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking in full NPs: ergative-absolutive |
Subjects of intransitive clauses and objects of transitives share a unique marker, while subjects of transitive clauses are unmarked or have a different marker |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking in full NPs: tripartite |
Intransitive subjects, transitive subjects, and transitive objects all receive distinct case markers |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking in full NPs: active-inactive |
Subjects of intransitive clauses are treated two different ways: like subjects of transitives if they are more agent-like (e.g. he jumped), and like objects of transitives if they are more patient-like (e.g. he fell asleep) |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking of pronouns: marked accusative |
|
n/a |
|
|
No case marking on pronouns in subject/object position. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798, 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking of pronouns: marked nominative |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798, 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking of pronouns: ergative-absolutive |
yes, no, mixed, other |
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798, 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking of pronouns: tripartite |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798, 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of case marking of pronouns: active-inactive |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798, 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of verbal person-marking: nominative-accusative |
Same as above, for pronominal affixes/clitics on verbs |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 802 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of verbal person-marking: ergative-absolutive |
yes, no, mixed, other |
yes |
|
|
From Mansen & Captain (2000), it seems as though the gender-marking suffixes are used for S and O, while prefixes are used for A. Sometimes, the O may be understood, and the verb still gets a prefix. They note that 'the form of the verb with a personal pr |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 802 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of verbal person-marking: active-inactive |
|
no |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of verbal person-marking: hierarchical |
Marking of A and P depends on their relative ranking on a hierarchy (usually 1>2>3 or 2>1>3) |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Alignment |
Alignment of verbal person-marking: split |
More than one of the above systems is represented in person marking, depending on e.g. person (e.g. 1/2 vs. 3), tense-aspect value, main vs. subordinate clause type, etc. |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Pronominal subjects: pronouns in subject position |
Pronominal subjects are free pronouns that occur in the same position as full NP subjects |
yes |
|
|
No distinction between pronominal subjects and subjects that are full NPs in the sentence structure given in Mansen and Captain (2000). |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Pronominal subjects: prefixes on verb |
Pronominal subjects are marked as verbal prefixes (free pronouns may be another option) |
yes |
|
|
Pronominal subjects can be indicated with either prefixes or suffixes on the verb (for both transitives and intransitives). Suffixes only distinguish gender, not person, but there is no other indication that these are adjectives (not verbs). |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 802 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Pronominal subjects: suffixes on verb |
Pronominal subjects are marked as verbal suffixes (free pronouns may be another option) |
yes |
|
|
Pronominal subjects can be indicated with either prefixes or suffixes on the verb (for both transitives and intransitives). Suffixes only distinguish gender, not person, but there is no other indication that these are adjectives (not verbs). |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 802 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Pronominal subjects: clitics on variable host |
Pronominal subjects are clitics that can attach to verbs, nominal constituents, etc. |
no |
|
|
There are free pronouns and verbal prefixes. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Pronominal subjects: pronouns in non-subject position |
Pronominal subjects are free pronouns but do not normally occur in the position expected for full NP subjects |
no |
|
|
No distinction between pronominal subjects and subjects that are full NPs in the sentence structure given in Mansen and Captain (2000). |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Person marking on intransitive verbs |
Intransitive verbs take person-marking clitics/affixes |
yes |
|
|
The argument of an intransitive is marked on the verb with a suffix (the same set of suffixes used for O). |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Person marking (of agents) on transitive verbs |
Transitive verbs take subject (A) markers |
yes |
|
|
Verbal prefixes mark the subject, suffixes mark object. There are examples of transitive verbs with person marking, no indication of whether person marking is less common on transitives. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Person-marking (of objects) on transitive verbs |
Transitive verbs take object (P) markers |
yes |
|
|
Verbal suffixes mark objects. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
3rd person zero in verbal person marking: subjects |
3rd person subjects are not overtly marked within the verbal person-marking system |
no |
nɨ- (masc.), sɨ- (nonmasc.) |
nɨ- (masc.), sɨ- (nonmasc.) |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
3rd person zero in verbal person marking: objects |
3rd person objects are not overtly marked within the verbal person-marking system |
no |
|
|
Third-person objects are marked in a number of different ways, depending on the tense/aspect of the verb. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Number can be marked separately from person on the verb |
Verbal person marking exists, but number is (or can) be marked separately |
no |
|
|
There are several different sets of person markers. The subject markers have suppletive plural forms. The object markers distinguish the three noun classes-masculine, non-masculine, and plural. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798, 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Possessive affixes/clitics on nouns are same as verbal person markers |
Where nouns take possessive affixes, these are the same as the person-marking affixes |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 798 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Pronouns and person marking |
Gender distinguished in verbal person markers |
For any person, verbal person markers exhibit different forms depending on the gender (masc/fem, animate/inanimate, etc.) of the referent |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 797 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice |
Ditransitive constructions: indirect object |
In ditransitives (e.g. 'John gives a book to Bill'), the theme (book) is treated in the same way as are objects of transitives, while the recipient/beneficiary (Bill) is treated differently |
yes |
-mɨin |
-mɨin |
The 'indirect object' (recipient) gets a case marker. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice |
Ditransitive constructions: double object |
In ditransitives (e.g. 'John gives Bill a book'), both the theme (book) and the recipient/beneficiary (Bill) is treated in the same way as are objects of transitives |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice |
Ditransitive constructions: secondary object |
In ditransitives, the recipient/beneficiary is treated in the same way as are objects of transitives, while the theme (book) is treated differently |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Decreasing |
Reciprocal: dedicated morpheme |
Verb becomes reciprocal through use of reciprocal morpheme associated with the verb (may be attached to the verb root). This morpheme is only used to mean reciprocal. |
yes |
-ira |
-ira |
Unclear: there is a morpheme -ira which is identified as a “reciprocal.” No discussion of whether this can also be used for reflexives (or what is used for reflexives. |
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Decreasing |
Reflexive: dedicated morpheme |
Verb becomes reflexive through use of reflexive morpheme associated with the verb (may be attached to the verb root). This morpheme is used only to mean reflexive. |
no |
|
|
Unclear: there is a morpheme -ira which is identified as a “reciprocal.” No discussion of whether this can also be used for reflexives (or what is used for reflexives, but since there is no separate reflexive morpheme pointed out, I assume there is no suc |
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Decreasing |
Reciprocal/reflexive: same morpheme |
Verb becomes reciprocal or reflexive through use of a morpheme that means either reciprocal or reflexive which attaches to the root of the verb |
no |
|
|
Unclear: there is a morpheme -ira which is identified as a “reciprocal.” No discussion of whether this can also be used for reflexives (or what is used for reflexives, but I assume that it is only a reciprocal marker. |
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Decreasing |
Passive |
Passive voice usually involves a change to the verb, while the object of the active voice verb is promoted to subject in the passive voice, and the former subject is deleted/demoted |
yes |
-n |
-n |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p.801, 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Decreasing |
Antipassive |
Like passive, but deletes or demotes the object of a transitive verb; usually found in ergative languages |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Decreasing |
Other intransitivizing morphology |
There is/are some other mechanism(s) for reducing valency |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Applicative: benefactive |
Applicative adds a beneficiary/maleficiary object argument to the verb |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Applicative: other |
Applicative adds some other object argument to the verb |
yes |
-aj (-oj, -ej) |
-aj (-oj, -ej) |
Not mentioned in Mansen & Captain (2000), but Mansen & Mansen (1984) mention a suffix that derives 'flee' from 'to go,' and 'drink x' from 'drink.' There are some verbs that seem to have this morpheme, but no corresponding simple verb, so it may be some s |
Mansen & Mansen (1984), p. 17; Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Causative: prefix |
Causative is morphological and is attached before the root of the verb |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Causative: suffix |
Causative is morphological and is attached after the root of the verb |
yes |
-ir |
-ir |
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Causative marked by circumfix, stem change, or tone |
Morphological causative other than simple prefix/suffix |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Causative: serial verb or analytical construction |
Causative construction that involves periphrasis or serialization |
no info |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Causative: dedicated 'make do by proxy' |
Indicates that the causer does not directly cause the action of the verb to be realized, but does so by inducing someone else to carry out the action, e.g. 'John had the house painted.' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Causative: dedicated sociative |
Indicates that causer participates in event |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Valence and voice - Increasing |
Other transitivizing morphology (adds valence) |
There is/are some other mechanism(s) for increasing valency |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Clausal negator is a preposed element |
Clausal negator is a preposed element |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Clausal negator is a postposed element |
Clausal negator is a postposed element |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Negatives: affix |
Negatives: affix |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Negatives: particle |
Negatives: particle |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Negatives: auxiliary verb |
Negatives: auxiliary verb |
yes |
noholaa |
noholaa |
Mansen & Captain (2000) say that the verb noholaa means 'no ser, no estar, no haber.' This verb takes person marking (in the unmarked, 'general' tense), which, interestingly, are different than those that attach to regular verbs. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Negatives: double |
Standard (non-emphatic) negation typically requires two morphemes, e.g. French 'ne V pas' |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Distinct negative form for 'NP does not exist' |
|
no |
|
|
The regular negative verb can have the meaning 'no haber,' as well as 'no ser' or 'no estar.' |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Negation |
Distinct negative expression 'I don't know' |
Lexical expression or highly idiomatic phrase |
no info |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Interrogatives |
Polar questions: interrogative particle |
Yes/no questions distinguished from declaratives by interrogative particle |
no |
|
|
The polar questions in Mansen & Mansen (1979) do not have a special interrogative particle. |
Mansen & Mansen 1979 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Interrogatives |
Polar questions: verb morphology |
Yes/no questions distinguished from declaratives by interrogative verb morphology |
no |
|
|
Although the polar questions in Mansen & Mansen (1979) have the same word order as declaratives, the morphoogical breakdown is not shown. However, there are morphological templates for verbs, none of which show a slot for a “question” morpheme. |
Mansen & Mansen (1979), Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 800-801 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Interrogatives |
Polar questions: word order |
Yes/no questions distinguished from declaratives by word order (esp. subject-verb inversion) |
no |
|
|
In the text in Mansen and Mansen (1979), polar questions follow the normal Guajiro VSO order. |
Mansen, Richard and Karis Mansen. (1979). Couyatalima: Texto de Guajiro. In Estudios de Guajiro, Ruth Monterroso (ed.). Lomalinda, Colombia: ILV |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Interrogatives |
Polar questions: intonation only |
Yes/no questions distinguished from declaratives by intonation only |
yes |
|
|
In the text in Mansen and Mansen (1979), polar questions follow the normal Guajiro VSO order. |
Mansen & Mansen (1979). |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Interrogatives |
Content questions: word order differs from declaratives |
Content questions distinguished from declaratives by word order (esp. subject-verb inversion) as well as by presence of Q-word (who, what, etc.) |
yes |
|
|
In the text in Mansen and Mansen (1979), all examples of content questions have preposed question words. |
|
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Predicate adjectives: verbal |
Adjectives act like verbs in predicative position |
no |
|
|
Mansen & Captain (2000) note that there are few true adjectives, most are stative verbs. However, they lump together numerals and adjectives. There is one example of a numeral in a predicate--this acts like a noun, rather than a verb. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Predicate adjectives: nominal |
Adjectives act like nouns in predicative position |
yes |
|
|
Mansen & Captain (2000) note that there are few true adjectives, most are stative verbs. However, they lump together numerals and adjectives. There is one example of a numeral in a predicate--this acts like a noun, rather than a verb. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Zero copula for predicate nominals is possible |
Predicate nominals may occur without a copula (i.e. grammatical in some circumstances, if not all) |
yes |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 803 |
|
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Headless relative clauses |
Compare Eng 'the one that fell' (but in Eng 'one' could be considered a head) |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Headless relative clauses are the dominant or only form of relative clause |
Relative clauses that form a constituent with a head noun (in a single noun phrase) are rare or nonexistent; some descriptions may refer to adjoined or correlative clauses. |
no |
|
|
|
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Relative clause may occur with a noun classifier/class marker |
It may be unclear whether the classifier is the nominal head of the construction or is an agreement marker on the relative clause |
yes |
|
|
Examples of relative clauses have class markers on the relativized verbs. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Relativizer is a verbal affix |
|
yes |
-kai (masc.) -kat (non-masculine), -kana (plural) |
-kai (masc.) -kat (non-masculine), -kana (plural) |
The description in Mansen and Captain (2000) says that the 'definite article' (=gender agreement marker?) is suffixed to the verb in the relative clause. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Predication |
Morphological relativizer is homophonous with nominalizer |
The same morpheme marks a relative clause and is a nominalizer on verbs (and/or other word classes) |
no |
|
|
The relativizer is homophonous with gender markers/'definite articles'. |
Mansen & Captain, 2000: p. 799 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Desiderative expressions |
Grammaticalized verbal desiderative |
Indicates that the subject desires to carry out the action denoted by the verb (distinct from verb 'want', but may be grammaticalized from it) |
yes |
-ee |
-ee |
|
Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 800 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Other |
Clause chaining |
Clauses can be grouped such that only one bears most of the verb morphology, and the others are marked as to whether they share a subject with this reference clause. |
yes |
|
|
Mansen and Mansen (1976) do not discuss this as clause chaining explicitly, but they describe a "simple sentence" as a nucleus plus one or more temporal, logical, or temporal-logical margins, which are marked with same/different subject particles, while t |
Mansen & Mansen, 1976: p. 166-172, Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Other |
Morphologically marked switch-reference system |
There are special markers to indicate same vs. different subject when two clauses are combined |
yes |
|
|
There are particles that do switch-reference and also marks the difference between concurrent and sequential clauses. |
Mansen & Mansen, 1976: p. 166-172, Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|
Simple Clauses - Other |
Morphologically marked distinction between simultaneous and sequential clauses |
Morphology (usually on verb) distinguishes between clauses denoting events that occur at the same time or in sequence |
yes |
|
|
There are particles that do switch-reference and also marks the difference between concurrent and sequential clauses. |
Mansen & Mansen, 1976: p. 166-172, Mansen & Captain 2000: p. 804 |
Aimee Lawrence |
|
|
|